Tag Archives: Politics

What if change never comes?

31 Aug

Are you waiting for change? Change that was promised to you in the last election campaign, or the one before that, or even earlier? What if that change never comes? The clips in this video highlight something we all know but either ignore, or feel powerless to change. Politics is losing its appeal, the lines are blurring, and political leaders, regardless of their party affiliation, seem to be singing the same tired old tune.

Having allowed ourselves to be seduced by bold political promises ay election time, when we look back we often see that, in reality, very little has changed. Certainly it feels like there have been very few significant changes for the better in recent years. It’s common to see articles complaining about how “they” – usually meaning one or other political leader – have failed to introduce beneficial changes, while at the same time introducing unexpected changes that have a negative impact, or are imposed on us without consultation. However, what should ultimately determine genuine change at the political level, is the extent to which we, as individuals, want that change. It should depend on whether we are willing to accept change, and the costs or benefits it brings.

But we also know that people do not always welcome or enjoy change. Much of the time, it scares them and makes them feel anxious and insecure. Even beneficial changes, like getting married, having a baby, or starting a new job, are among the most stressful events in our lives. The politicians making those bold speeches about “change” know this too. In fact, they rely on it to prevent people complaining about broken promises, or banding together to demand consultation on important changes, or campaigning to repeal new laws that represent abuse of power.

If you really want ‘change you can believe in’, start by believing in your power to think and reason for yourself. Learn how to step back and resist the impulsive urge, or urgent authoritative command, to jump to conclusions or follow the herd. Give yourself permission to not have an opinion, at least until you have had time to consider all the evidence and to think critically, outside of the margins of the information being presented to you. Be OK with “I don’t know yet” or “I’m not sure yet” and even with “I might never know.” You don’t have to believe everything you hear or read. You don’t have to be a “follower” just because someone else is a “leader.”

The strange part is, we all accept that we don’t and can’t have the answer to absolutely everything, but we can easily be swayed to react in a certain way whenever we are reminded of just how much we don’t know, or if we are made to feel threatened. These are cheap vaudeville tricks, which have earned their place in the entertainment industry, but they can take on a darker aspect when used by statesmen, media, or corporations, to manipulate public opinion. Uncertainty is not the enemy, it’s one of the most fundamental principles of life. Don’t give it up without stopping to think or question.

keep-calm-and-hakuna-matata

Source

Liquefying Democracy: How the German Pirate Party is Crowdsourcing Politics

15 Jun

Personal Democracy Forum 2012 | June 11-12 | NYC “The Internet’s New Political Power”

The worlds leading conference exploring and analyzing technologys impact on politics and government returned to the NYU Skirball Center June 11-12, 2012, with hundreds of individuals in attendance interested in how technology is changing politics, governance and society.

Full conference schedule

A complete list of the more than 120 speakers:

Detailed description of the main theme and plenary program:

Liquid Democracy

6 Nov
Illustration of how liquid democracy works.

Illustration of how Liquid Democracy Works via Wikipedia

Liquid democracy is a group-decision-making method that works as a sort of  “direct democracy for people who know they’re not experts on a subject, but know of people that they trust who who know more about a subject than themselves”. Questions are settled by asking everyone… but many people’s answer will be “whatever X says”.

It works by enabling people to solicit recommendations on how to vote from people they trust. So, people who know nothing about foreign policy can get vote recommendations on a subject from people who agree with the basic thrust of similar values and who either have a personal connection with pundits or experts on a given subject who also agree with the attitude, or who are experts in their own right.

In fact, one of the original influences on Liquid Democracy was the desire to replace the chain of command in a military situation with something more efficient and flexible. The idea was that if hierarchy in such a vital situation could be outcompeted on a power versus power basis by something less hierarchical, then hierarchical social decision-making system in general would have less credibility.

What Does Liquid Democracy Mean?

Liquid Democracy is a collective term for different approaches to making democracy more liquid, more transparent and more flexible. What all these approaches have in common is the concept of delegating your vote for certain subject areas or subjects. This makes it possible to choose to actively participate in some subject areas and delegate your vote to someone else for others.

Organisations and informal groups can use Liquid Democracy to collaboratively develop their goals, strategies, internal rules or positions and to make binding decisions about them. Groups and organisations can involve their members in developing solutions to their problems and thus make better decisions. Our web platform implements the two key concepts of Liquid Democracy: structured discourse and delegated voting.

Members of organisations can collaboratively create texts, debate individual paragraphs, and vote on the final draft. Each member can at any time delegate their vote to another member or use it themselves.

Why Liquid Democracy?

Technological progress of the last few years has made global communication a lot easier and faster. These new possibilities have yet to be fully utilized for society. Citizens are involved with organisations, informal groups and networks of all kinds. At the same time, many people feel they are lacking the opportunity to effectively and collaboratively campaign for the issues they are concerned about. This is the problem that Liquid Democracy focuses on.

Liquid Democracy Tools

Communication, exchange of experiences and decision-making in organisations and groups often takes place using inappropriate tools: there are forums, wikis, mailing lists, conference calls and face-to-face meetings. All of these work relatively well in small groups but quickly reach their limits in larger groups – this often leads to a situation where a small minority actually participates or where transparency and clarity dwindle. Tools such as Adhocracy were developed to facilitate broad and democratic involvement of members of large groups.

via Einleitung – adhocracy.de and Wikia